View Full Version : Humongous Recorders
Gandalfe
01-05-2008, 04:44 PM
Not all recorders are small. See:
http://www.adrianabreukink.com
Tip of the hat to Ken Shaw for these links.
A=466? Shall we start up the low vs. high pitch debate again?
Ed Svoboda
01-06-2008, 07:17 AM
A=466? Shall we start up the low vs. high pitch debate again?
Sure!
Well, A=466 is a tad higher than even high pitch, which is A=457hz.
I did some brief Googling. A=466hz is a Renaissance standard. Also used on bagpipes.
... And we have another woodwind for the Exotica area: the Curtal (http://www.twingroves.district96.k12.il.us/RenAissance/Town/Music/Curtals.html). It's a double reed.
(Yah. We could have an entire section on Renaissance woodwinds. Yes, I can mention another Peter Schickele recording with Renaissance woodwinds: Bestiary. Out of print, everywhere. I have it on cassette.)
spooky
11-06-2011, 10:50 PM
Bigger is better in my world. I used to play a couple contrabass recorders, and if I recall correctly the intonation was quite satisfactory for something of it's kind. I typically don't like recorders, but the contras were a blast. Good luck finding a nice one that plays in tune, though.
I definitely think that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQFqYbaiG1w is a really nice sound. I'd like a better quality recording, though.
I might have to do a feature page or two about recorders, on my blog. I know that there are a few really interesting ones out there ....
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.