I just recently moved, and one of the few positives of any move is rediscovering long forgotten items.
One such item was an old Doonesbury volume that I've been reading. One of these strips discussed
how the word "Superstar " had been overused and devalued. It got me thinking of how often other
people (myself included) over use words like Legend, Great, Monster ... when it comes to their favorite player.
So what does define a Great player, a Legend ? For me, a truly great player must possess both great technical skills along with a creative and expressive style to a high degree. If they fall short in any area, I consider them as an excellent player and musician, perhaps one of the better players, but not necessarily great or a legend. They could well be one of my most favorite musicians, but I still would not classify them as great or legendary. For an example, a certain sax player with a suspect tonal quality does not fall into my category of a Legend like many others would tag him so. He may be a pioneer, but for me pioneer and legendary are 2 distinctly different descriptions. His place in history is confirmed, but does that make him a "GREAT PLAYER" ?
So what I would ask of others is this. What is your idea of a Legend ? Should we be so generous with our praise ?
Do we diminish the praise heaped on the truly deserving by casually bestowing same such praise on others less deserving ? I for one have always been of the mindset that there is not enough recognition and attention given to todays instrumental musicians. But does that mean we tag all popular players as great ? Do we tag yesterdays players as legends just because they came first ?
I am interested to hear what you all believe.
Stephen
And yes, I do have too much time on my hands at the moment.
One such item was an old Doonesbury volume that I've been reading. One of these strips discussed
how the word "Superstar " had been overused and devalued. It got me thinking of how often other
people (myself included) over use words like Legend, Great, Monster ... when it comes to their favorite player.
So what does define a Great player, a Legend ? For me, a truly great player must possess both great technical skills along with a creative and expressive style to a high degree. If they fall short in any area, I consider them as an excellent player and musician, perhaps one of the better players, but not necessarily great or a legend. They could well be one of my most favorite musicians, but I still would not classify them as great or legendary. For an example, a certain sax player with a suspect tonal quality does not fall into my category of a Legend like many others would tag him so. He may be a pioneer, but for me pioneer and legendary are 2 distinctly different descriptions. His place in history is confirmed, but does that make him a "GREAT PLAYER" ?
So what I would ask of others is this. What is your idea of a Legend ? Should we be so generous with our praise ?
Do we diminish the praise heaped on the truly deserving by casually bestowing same such praise on others less deserving ? I for one have always been of the mindset that there is not enough recognition and attention given to todays instrumental musicians. But does that mean we tag all popular players as great ? Do we tag yesterdays players as legends just because they came first ?
I am interested to hear what you all believe.
Stephen
And yes, I do have too much time on my hands at the moment.
Last edited: