Untitled Document
Advertisement Click to advertise with us!

Could someone explain the Albert system


Staff member
I see Albert system clarinets from time to time but haven't ever played one. I've heard people say that the bore tends to be narrower than Boehm and that the horn is perhaps a bit longer. They're no longer made and at one time where played by a lot of dixie land players.

What are the other pros and cons? As a sax player I am a bit attracted to trying an Albert just because I find all the alternate keys on Boehm's to be overkill. Or maybe it's just too much to remember. Anyways, please enlighten me.


Old King Log
Staff member

A long time ago, there was this guy named Anton Muller. Ol' Tony was the first really innovative clarinetist who looked at the original horn (with perhaps four or five keys) and decided that he or someone could do better. As a result, he (or someone else) "rationalized" the clarinet, adding a number of "extra keys" at that time, and produced a clarinet that, if not completely capable, was pretty capable of playing in all keys.

From that starting point, the two main clarinet "systems" were launched. Once the resistance of the various "official" boards that governed music at a national level was overcome, the new instrument (let's call it the "simple" clarinet) rapidly displaced the older, cross fingered to the nines horns.

(Incidentally, Tony was also the one responsible for the screw ligature. Prior to that it was string, string and more string.)

Then, a fellow by the name of Klose (you may have heard of him) decided that he could do better. He reworked the Muller clarinet, adding the system of axles, rings, and relocated tonehole openings that was pioneered by Boehm, the flute perfecter. In doing so, there were two major differences introduced in what became known as the Boehm clarinet (more properly the Klose/Boehm, but let's not split hairs).

On the Boehm version of the clarinet (pretty much set in stone since the 1830's), the elimination of cross fingerings resulted in the left thumb equals F natural and first finger equals Bb scheme that you know and love. This in turn meant that the two "fundamental scales of the horn" (F major and C major with the register key) were a straight progression up the horn (lifting one finger after another, without any diversions). And, that's where the Boehm clarinet remains today, with detours like the Mazzeo best left unsaid.

Meanwhile, the Mueller clarinet didn't remain static. Through various makers, additions were added to the "original clarinet", mostly as improvements. (One of the major ones, the so-called "patent C#" would be useful on a Boehm horn if anyone offered it.) As these improvements were added, certain makers (including one Albert, a French or Belgian maker) became associated with certain sets and thus was born the Albert "system".

Like Boehm clarinets, Albert horns come in various forms with additional keys, higher quality of manufacture, and so on. Unlike Boehm horns, made by a variety of firms, the "Albert" system, really just a significant improvement to the Mueller clarinet, became associated with just the one firm. At one point, most of the makers made "Albert" horns, including Selmer, Buffet, Noblet, and (I think) B & H.

These days, they are seldom made. The last one that I have heard of was a replacement made for Woody Allen. His prized Albert horn cracked through and through, and the manufacturer (do doubt at great expense) produced a new one. Other than that, they are not being made from new these days.

But wait, there's more. Several German manufacturers went a few steps further. One Oskar Oehler took the Mueller clarinet to its ultimate conclusion, creating something that is often called the "Oehler system" in the process. While similar to the Albert horn, the Oehler instruments incorporate extra keys, venting and some perverse "improvements" that have led to a clarinet that is the "same" while at the same time is quite different.

On all three "systems", a Bb is a Bb (on a Bb pitch horn). However, there are differences. One is the infamous sharp facility offered by the Albert/Oehler horns. In effect, it's easier to play in sharp keys on one, this due to the fork fingerings that are retained (albeit in modified form). There's no thumb ring on the "German style" horns, and thumb down gives you F#, not F. Ditto the right hand; first finger down is B natural, not Bb. Sort of like the sax on the left hand, but not at all like the sax for the right.

The other is the very obvious non-duplication of the little finger keys. Instead, you have the patent C# and a couple of other alternatives. Not as facile as a Boehm, and neither measure up to a full Boehm.

(This may be one of the advantages seen in the Albert by some saxophone players; those Albert little finger keys look a hell of a lot like those on a sax. However, if I had my druthers, I'd opt for the Boehm if I was playing only one horn; it's a lot simpler than is the Albert/Oehler.)

And, there are other differences. Bore sizes are different; an Albert blows "more freely" than does a Boehm. The Boehm and the Albert take a different mouthpiece than does the Oehler; the Oehler uses a very tight lay and a very hard reed.

Finally, the cost. You can pick up a decent cheap Boehm horn, either student, intermediate or pro, on the secondary market. You can pick up an Albert horn, either student or pro, on eBay, but it's going to be as old as Methusila, and it will almost certainly require a rebuild. You can purchase a German ("Oehler") clarinet, in one of many different models, but it's usually going to cost you a lot more.

Nothing is "wrong" (per se) with any one of the three "systems". There have been spectacular players on all three horns. For example, Lazarus, he of the method books and long tenure as a top British clarinetist, played the Albert horn to the day of his death. (That's one of the reasons that there are several odd etudes in his method; they were written with Albert fingering issues in mind, and thus don't really seem to be up to the difficulty level on the Boehm horn.)

However, for the last ninety years or so, almost all clarinet players outside of Germany, Austria, Russia and (in part) The Netherlands have been taught on the Boehm. The Albert has slowly faded (except for the occasional outlier like me) until it's sort of like Welsh - spoken by a few but for the most part ignored. Meanwhile, in their own little Teutonic ghetto, "German style" players keep the Oehler horn (and its simpler cousins) alive and very well.

Now, what about the Romero clarinet? Wanna know about that one?


Brassica Oleracea
Staff member
Re: Well...

SOTSDO said:
Now, what about the Romero clarinet? Wanna know about that one?
Go 4 it. If you've got info on the Quartertone, too, that'd be interesting

Dave Dolson

Distinguished Member
Distinguished Member
Ed and Terry: I enjoyed Terry's discussion on the Albert System. I have two at this time and have owned others. Mine are both Bb soprano models from Buescher and Conn - the Conn being a hard-rubber body, Buescher is wood.

Several trad jazz guys still play Alberts as did many of the famous jazzers from long ago . . . Bechet, Dodds, Lewis, Jimmy Dorsey, Jimmie Noone, etc. A friend of mine (whose playing I really admire) plays a Buffet Albert made in 1887. He admits to using a number of odd-ball fingerings to play it in tune - but he does a great job on it. Another local southern California player is an absolute fiend - VERY fast and accurate on his Albert, playing a variety of Dixieland, swing, and classical pieces.

They are still made - I think Yamaha makes one (saw it advertised in a past WW&BW catalog) and I think maybe Amati makes an Albert. There are also (maybe WERE) a few eastern European makers several years ago - don't know if they continue to make them.

I recall seeing a German oompah band come through Kalispell, MT several years ago on a tour. Our band was playing at the same event. They had several Albert clarinets (in fact, all of the clarinets were Alberts and there were probably nine or ten in the group). On a break, I asked one of them if I could try one of their clarinets. They all snickered and let me have one. You shoulda seen the look on their faces when I played a blues on it.

I've heard all the talk about different tonal qualities, but I don't believe it. My Alberts sound like me when I play them, but I prefer my Buffets (Boehm System) better - more free-blowing and just easier all around to play. And they sound just the same. The really difficult part on Albert for me is the extreme spread of the right-hand fingers - the Boehm being much closer together. I think the popularity of the Albert in old jazz is merely because the masters played them - and we MUST be like them, eh? DAVE


Staff member

I was hoping you would chime in as I know you play a lot of clarinet and dixieland. We should all be emulating Bechet . . . especially on soprano. Think how much better people would sound!