Or in this case, bleeding edge.Better stable than leading edge...
Advertisement | ![]() |
Click to advertise with us! |
Or in this case, bleeding edge.Better stable than leading edge...
<sigh>Or in this case, bleeding edge.tictactux said:Better stable than leading edge...
Well, here's the thing:On the other hand - if they ditch support for 3.x in favour of 4.x (which should work), what are you going to lose? If you don't touch it, this old version can't run any worse than a bright shiny new product.
Better stable than leading edge...
Now imagine that - I own a piece of 6-or-so year-old software that uses a forty-six-or-so year-old operator...well I think I simply rest my case.Well, here's the thing:I'm a member of another forum that's using 6-or-so year-old software.
Last weekend I had to blow the dust off my trusty TurboPascal in order to create some DOS (yes, DOS) hack.I still use some older software once in a while. A great password keeper that I use all the time is called Pins. It was last updated in 2003. You can find it here: http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/pins.html
To me, that means that I've gotta set up a 4.x testing forum again. I might get around to that when I've got a few vacation days next month.vBulletin said:This means that [3.8] will not have further bug-fix release or new functionality added and may not have any future security patches. We will evaluate security issues if they are received.
Good luck with that. Hope all goes well.Done. If you have any problems, please post in the Problem Reports thread or e-mail/PM me -- today only -- or one of the Admins.
I will be going in to the dr. for a hernia repair operation, tomorrow. I'm assuming I'll be fairly medicated over the next several days.